الحديث الكذب والموضوع عند الإمام أبي حاتم الرازي من خلال كتاب الجرح والتعديل لابنه

Abstract

The research notion can be summarised in collecting Imam Abi Hatim Al-Razi's rulings on a hadith as a falsehood and fabrication through extrapolating the entire book of "Aljarh Watta'deel" of his son. I have collected seventeen hadiths, and attempted to classify these hadiths (as some of them did not have their texts stated), verify and rule on them. Then I elicited the definition of falsified and unauthenticated Hadith in Al-Razi's opinion through the hadiths of the study, and tried inferring if there a distinction between them, or they are equivalent terms, along with balancing between his opinion and what is settled with the late Hadith scholars.

The research aims to limit the rulings of Imam Abu Hatim Al-Razi on a hadith as falsified or unauthenticated.

The researcher reached a number of results, the most important of which are:

• The number of places in which Abu Hatim Al-Razi ruled on hadiths as false or unauthenticated in the book "Aljarh Watta’deel" is seventeen. The text of the hadith was stated in four of them, and I was able to identify the texts of seven hadiths, but I was not able to pinpoint the rest of them.
• Taking care of collecting the opinions of the scholar from his other books, which helps in understanding his opinions; the book "Al'ulal" by Ibn Abi Hatim helped in identifying some hadiths that their texts were not explicitly stated.
• There is no hadith in the nine books that Abu Hatim Al-Razi ruled, except one hadith that was verified by Ibn Majah, as in the eleventh hadith.
• There is no hadith in the books of "Assihaah" that Abu Hatim Al-Razi ruled, except one hadith that Al-Hakim verified in his "Almustadrak", as in the first hadith. This supports the lower degree of the book "Almustadrak" from the rest of the books of "Assahaah".