Mechanisms of text grammar in the explanations of grammatical evidence
Keywords:
text, grammatical evidence, intentionalityAbstract
This research aims to reveal mechanisms closely related to the text and its issues that were followed by the commentators of grammatical evidence in order to understand the poetic witness, its interpretation, and the correct realization of its meaning.
Thus, the importance of this research is evident in that it represents a scientific orientation in proving that the Arab heritage is not without great contributions located within a framework towards the text.
In achieving this goal, the researcher relied on the descriptive approach based on induction and analysis.
The research included the mechanism of returning the witness to its place in the text, the mechanism of standing on the relationships of the text’s casting and weaving, the mechanism of admissibility in the face of intentionality, and the mechanism of seeking help from the context of the situation and intertextuality.
The research reached important results, the most prominent of which were:
- This research was able to present a balance between the syntax of the sentence represented in the normative rule in the grammatical tradition books and the text towards the text represented in the books of explanations of grammatical evidence by addressing the poetic witness; The difference in the goal led to the difference in the approach; The witness in the grammar books is excerpted from its text, and it is often a single line; Because the attention is focused on the place of martyrdom to reach the normative rule envisaged by the grammarians. As for the books of explanations of grammatical evidence, the goal was to interpret the witness and reach its meaning; Therefore, these explanations provided various text processors to reach this meaning.
- The research proved that the sites of error in interpreting the meaning of the witness in which one of the commentators was sometimes located is due to his neglect of textual grammatical processors that he should have relied on, and when another interpreter used them, he fell into the error of his owner, and reached the correct meaning.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 ِabhath Journal for the Humanities
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.