Ethics of scientific publishing

1- Publisher's Responsibility:
Publishing Decision: Copyright and citation rights must be respected in order to preserve the rights of others when publishing research in journals. The editor-in-chief is responsible for the decision to publish and publish, based on journal policies and adherence to legal publishing requirements, particularly with regard to defamation, slander, copyright infringement, or piracy. The editor-in-chief may also consult with members of the editorial board or reviewers in making this decision.
Integrity: The editor-in-chief ensures that the content of each article submitted for publication is evaluated, regardless of the author's gender, origin, religious belief, citizenship, or political affiliation.
Confidentiality: Information about research authors must be strictly confidential and maintained by all persons who may have access to it, such as the editor-in-chief, members of the editorial board, any member involved in editing and publishing, and other trusted parties as required by the review process.
Express Consent: The research results of others related to unpublishable research may not be used or exploited without written permission from the author.
2- The Referee's Responsibilities (Reviewers):
Contributing to the Publishing Decision: The reviewer assists the editor-in-chief and the editorial board in making the publishing decision, as well as assisting the author in improving and correcting the research.
Promptness of Service and Adherence to Deadlines: The reviewer must take the initiative and promptly evaluate the research submitted to him within the specified deadlines. If this is not possible after completing the initial study of the research, he must inform the editor-in-chief that the research topic is outside the scope of the reviewer's work, or delay the review due to time constraints or insufficient resources.
Confidentiality: All research information must be confidential to the reviewer, and the reviewer must strive to maintain its confidentiality. It is not permissible to disclose or discuss its content with anyone except those authorized by the editor-in-chief.
Objectivity: The reviewer must demonstrate their review and evaluation of the research submitted to him with objective arguments and evidence, and must avoid basing their review on personal viewpoints, personal taste, racism, sectarianism, etc. Source Identification: The referee must attempt to identify sources and references related to the topic (research). Any text or paragraph taken from other previously published works must be properly documented. The referee must inform the editor-in-chief and warn him/her of any similar, similar, or overlapping works with the work under review.
Conflict of Interest: The referee must not referee research for personal gain. This means that the referee must not accept to referee research in which personal interests may exist between individuals or institutions or in which personal relationships may be observed.
3- Author's Responsibility:
Preparation Criteria: The author must submit original research and present it accurately and objectively, in a consistent, scientific manner that meets the specifications of peer-reviewed research in terms of language, form, and content. This must be in accordance with the journal's publishing standards and policies. The data must be accurately presented, including full references, and the rights of others in the research must be respected. The referee must avoid presenting sensitive and unethical topics, tastelessness, personalization, ethnic and sectarian bias, false and inaccurate information, and translating the works of others without citing the source of the quotation in the research.
Originality and Plagiarism: The author must prove the originality of their work, and any quotation or use of other people's paragraphs or words must be appropriately and correctly disambiguated. The journal reserves the right to use plagiarism detection software to detect plagiarism in submitted works.

Republication: The author may not submit the same work (research) to more than one journal or conference, as doing so is considered unethical and unacceptable behavior.

Data Access and Retention: The author must retain the private data used in their research and provide it upon request from the editorial board or reviewer.

Research Authors: The number of authors of the research should be limited to only those who have significantly and clearly contributed to the design and implementation of the research, with the responsibility for the research being clearly identified.

References and References: The author is obligated to cite references appropriately. The reference must include all books, publications, websites, and other research by individuals cited or referenced in the text of the research.

Reporting errors: If the author becomes aware of and discovers a fundamental error or inaccuracy in the details of his research at any time, he must immediately notify the editor-in-chief of the journal or the publisher and cooperate to correct the error.